Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Temporal trends in misclassification patterns of measured and self-report based body mass index categories - findings from three population surveys in Ireland

Frances Shiely12*, Ivan J Perry1, Jennifer Lutomski1, Janas Harrington1, C Cecily Kelleher3, Hannah McGee4 and Kevin Hayes5

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, College Road, Cork, Ireland

2 Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, USA

3 School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

4 Population Health Sciences (Psychology), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

5 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2010, 10:560  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-560

Published: 17 September 2010

Abstract

Background

As the use of self-reported data to classify obesity continues, the temporal change in the accuracy of self-report measurement when compared to clinical measurement remains unclear. The objective of this study was to examine temporal trends in misclassification patterns, as well as sensitivity and specificity, of clinically measured versus self-report based body mass index (BMI) from three national lifestyle surveys over a 10-year period.

Methods

The Surveys of Lifestyle Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN) were interview based cross-sectional survey/measurements involving nationally representative samples in 1998, 2002 and 2007. Data from a subsample of both self-reported and measured height and weight were available from 66 men and 142 women in 1998, 147 men and 184 women in 2002 and 909 men and 1128 women in 2007. Respondents were classified into the BMI categories normal (< 25 kg m-2), overweight (25- < 30 kg m-2) and obese (≥ 30 kg m-2).

Results

Underreporting of BMI increased across the three surveys (14%→21%→24%; p = 0.002). Sensitivity scores for the normal category exceeded 94% in all three surveys but decreased for the overweight (75%→68%→66%) and obese categories (80%→64%→53%). Simultaneously, specificity levels remained high.

Conclusions

BMI values based on self-reported determinations of height and weight in population samples are underestimating the true prevalence of the obesity epidemic and this underestimation is increasing with time. The decreased sensitivity and consistently high specificity scores in the obese category across time, highlights the limitation of self-report based BMI classifications and the need for simple, readily comprehensible indicators of obesity.