Research article

The experience of admission to psychiatric hospital among Chinese adult patients in Hong Kong

Jackie Chi-Kin Fu¹ , Paulina Po-Ling Chow² and Linda Chiu-Wa Lam³

¹General Adult Team, Department of Psychiatry, Castle Peak Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, PR China

²Psychogeriatric Team, Department of Psychiatry, Castle Peak Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, PR China

³Department of Psychiatry, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po Hospital, Tai Po, Hong Kong, PR China

author email corresponding author email

BMC Psychiatry 2008, 8:86doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-86

Published:	17 October 2008

Abstract

Background

The paper reports on a study to evaluate the psychometric properties and cultural appropriateness of the Chinese translation of the Admission Experience Survey (AES).

Methods

The AES was translated into Chinese and back-translated. Content validity was established by focus groups and expert panel review. The Chinese version of the Admission Experience Survey (C-AES) was administered to 135 consecutively recruited adult psychiatric patients in the Castle Peak Hospital (Hong Kong SAR, China) within 48 hours of admission. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the scores from patients admitted voluntarily versus patients committed involuntarily, and those received physical or chemical restraint versus those who did not. The relationship between admission experience and psychopathology was examined by correlating C-AES scores with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores.

Results

Spearman's item-to-total correlations of the C-AES ranged from 0.50 to 0.74. Three factors from the C-AES were extracted using factor analysis. Item 12 was omitted because of poor internal consistency and factor loading. The factor structure of the Process Exclusion Scale (C-PES) corresponded to the English version, while some discrepancies were noted in the Perceived Coercion Scale (C-PCS) and the Negative Pressure Scale (C-NPS). All subscales had good internal consistencies. Scores were significantly higher for patients either committed involuntarily or subjected to chemical or physical restrain, independent on severity of psychotic symptoms.

Conclusion

The Chinese AES is a psychometrically sound instrument assessing the three different aspects of the experience of admission, namely "negative pressure, "process exclusion" and "perceived coercion". The potential of C-AES in exploring subjective experience of psychiatric admission and effects on treatment adherence should be further explored.