Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Psychiatry and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: World Psychiatric Association (WPA) Thematic Conference. Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Review

Open Access Oral presentation

How can variations in civil commitment rates within and between countries be understood?

Lars Kjellin1*, Marianne Engberg2, Georg Høyer3, Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino4 and Maria Sigurjónsdóttir5

  • * Corresponding author: Lars Kjellin

Author Affiliations

1 Psychiatric Research Center, P.O.Box 1613, SE-70116 Örebro, Sweden

2 University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

3 University of Tromsø, Institute of Community Medicine, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

4 University of Tampere, Tampere School of Public Health, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland

5 Blakstad Psychiatric Hospital, Blakstad, Asker, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Psychiatry 2007, 7(Suppl 1):S142  doi:10.1186/1471-244X-7-S1-S142


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/7/S1/S142


Published:19 December 2007

© 2007 Kjellin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Background

To compare civil commitment rates between different catchment areas in the Nordic countries and to explore how variations in civil commitment rates can be understood.

Methods

One psychiatric setting in Denmark, three in Finland, one in Iceland, four in Norway and three in Sweden participated in this part of the Nordic study on the use of coercion in the mental health care system. Data from medical records and related documents were registered for about 5,500 admissions of committed and voluntarily admitted patients in the years 1996–1999. A registration form specially designed for the study was used, including demographical and medical data and data on legal status for each admission. Information about the structure of the participating wards was collected separately.

Results

Nearly a tenfold difference was found between the catchment area with the highest and the area with the lowest civil commitment rate. Within countries, the greatest area variation was found between the three Swedish centers, with a threefold difference. The same magnitude of variation was found with regard to quotas of involuntary admissions, i.e. the proportion of civil commitments of all admissions. In preliminary analyses, no clear associations were found between civil commitment rates and demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients and organizational characteristics of the participating psychiatric wards.

Conclusion

Differences in legal prerequisites may be one factor explaining international variation in commitment rates, but predictors for variations within jurisdictions, with a uniform legislation, need to be further examined. The results of forthcoming analyses of the Nordic data will be presented.