Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Psychiatry and BioMed Central.

Open Access Correspondence

Correcting and interpreting the effect of cognitive therapy versus exposure in anxiety disorders

Shanil Ebrahim1* and Sheena Bance2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2 Department of Adult Education and Counselling Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:202  doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-202

Published: 20 November 2012

Abstract

Dr. Ougrin’s evaluation of cognitive therapy versus exposure in anxiety disorders reported a standardised mean difference [SMD] (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.52 (0.37, 0.74) for short-term outcomes and 0.46 (0.29, 0.73) for long-term outcomes in social phobia, and 0.88 (0.69, 1.11) for short-term outcomes and 1.05 (0.80, 1.37) for long-term outcomes in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These were incorrectly meta-analysed. Upon re-analysis, we found that the correct SMD (95% CI) was −0.66 (−1.19, -0.14) for short-term outcomes and mean difference (95% CI) of −29.66 (−46.13, -13.19) on the Social Phobia subscale from the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory for long-term outcomes in Social Phobia. For PTSD, the SMD (95% CI) for short-term outcomes was −0.13 (−0.36, 0.11) and 0.05 (−0.22, 0.32) for long-term outcomes. However, correcting the errors did not change the interpretation of the findings considerably.

Keywords:
Cognitive therapy; Exposure; Anxiety disorders; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Correspondence; Correction