|
BMC Pediatrics Volume 5
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 Research articleDalhousie dyspnea scales: construct and content validity of pictorial scales for measuring dyspneaPatrick J McGrath1,2,3 , Paul T Pianosi2,3 , Anita M Unruh4 and Chloe P Buckley2  1Departments of Psychology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, NS, B3H 4J1, Canada 2IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada 3Department of Pediatrics Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada 4School of Health and Human Performance and School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, 1459 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada author email corresponding author email
BMC Pediatrics 2005,
5:33doi:10.1186/1471-2431-5-33
|
|
| Published: |
30 August 2005 |
Abstract
Background
Because there are no child-friendly, validated, self-report measures of dyspnea or breathlessness, we developed, and provided initial validation, of three, 7-item, pictorial scales depicting three sub-constructs of dyspnea: throat closing, chest tightness, and effort.
Methods
We developed the three scales (Throat closing, Chest tightness, and Effort) using focus groups with 25 children. Subsequently, seventy-nine children (29 children with asthma, 30 children with cystic fibrosis. and 20 children who were healthy) aged 6 to 18 years rated each picture in each series, using a 0–10 scale. In addition, each child placed each picture in each series on a 100-cm long Visual Analogue Scale, with the anchors "not at all" and "a lot".
Results
Children aged eight years or older rated the scales in the correct order 75% to 98% correctly, but children less than 8 years of age performed unreliably. The mean distance between each consecutive item in each pictorial scale was equal.
Conclusion
Preliminary results revealed that children aged 8 to 18 years understood and used these three scales measuring throat closing, chest tightness, and effort appropriately. The scales appear to accurately measure the construct of breathlessness, at least at an interval level. Additional research applying these scales to clinical situations is warranted. |