Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Pediatrics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Variations in rates of nosocomial infection among Canadian neonatal intensive care units may be practice-related

Khalid Aziz1, Douglas D McMillan2, Wayne Andrews6, Margaret Pendray3, Zhenguo Qiu4, Stella Karuri4, Shoo K Lee34* and The Canadian Neonatal Network5

Author Affiliations

1 Discipline of Pediatrics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's NF, Canada

2 Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS, Canada

3 Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada

4 Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, Vancouver BC, Canada

5 Canadian Neonatal Network Coordinating Center, Vancouver BC, Canada

6 Discipline of Pediatrics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St Johns NF, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Pediatrics 2005, 5:22  doi:10.1186/1471-2431-5-22

Published: 8 July 2005

Abstract

Background

Nosocomial infection (NI), particularly with positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid bacterial cultures, is a major cause of morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Rates of NI appear to vary substantially between NICUs. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for NI, as well as the risk-adjusted variations in NI rates among Canadian NICUs.

Methods

From January 1996 to October 1997, data on demographics, intervention, illness severity and NI rates were submitted from 17 Canadian NICUs. Infants admitted at <4 days of age were included. NI was defined as a positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture after > 48 hrs in hospital.

Results

765 (23.5%) of 3253 infants <1500 g and 328 (2.5%) of 13228 infants ≥1500 g developed at least one episode of NI. Over 95% of episodes were due to nosocomial bacteremia. Major morbidity was more common amongst those with NI versus those without. Mortality was more strongly associated with NI versus those without for infants ≥1500 g, but not for infants <1500 g. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that for infants <1500 g, risk factors for NI included gestation <29 weeks, outborn status, increased acuity on day 1, mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition. When NICUs were compared for babies <1500 g, the odds ratios for NI ranged from 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1 to 0.4) to 8.6 (95% CI 4.1 to 18.2) when compared to a reference site. This trend persisted after adjustment for risk factors, and was also found in larger babies.

Conclusion

Rates of nosocomial infection in Canadian NICUs vary considerably, even after adjustment for known risk factors. The implication is that this variation is due to differences in clinical practices and therefore may be amenable to interventions that alter practice.