Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marianne Hillemeier |
28 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pelayo Correa |
1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucia Braga |
11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marianne Hillemeier |
28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
17 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Khitam Muhsen |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
17 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
25 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-43 |
You can find further information about peer review here.