Open Access Highly Accessed Open Badges Study protocol

Complementary feeding: a Global Network cluster randomized controlled trial

Nancy F Krebs*, K Michael Hambidge, Manolo Mazariegos, Jamie Westcott, Norman Goco, Linda L Wright, Marion Koso-Thomas, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl Bose, Omrana Pasha, Robert Goldenberg, Elwyn Chomba, Waldemar Carlo, Mark Kindem, Abhik Das, Ty Hartwell, Elizabeth McClure and the Complementary Feeding Study Group

BMC Pediatrics 2011, 11:4  doi:10.1186/1471-2431-11-4

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

dominant effect of protein

Peter Woolf   (2011-03-17 09:16)  Foodwiki LLC email

I'm curious about the protein composition of the two diets. As you show in Table 1, the beef diet adds 13 or 19.5 g of protein for the 6-12 and 13-18 month range, while the cereal diet adds only 3.07 or 4.60 for each group.

RDA values for protein for infants up to 12 months are 13-14 g/day while for 1-3 years old is 16 g/day. In this case, the beef is providing 100% or more of the infant's RDA of protein, while the cereal is providing only ~20%.

The role of dietary protein on linear growth is well established when protein is limiting--which is likely to be the case here.

It would be interesting if in the study you also measured/estimated the protein intake per infant in both groups in each location. This would help to tease out the role of total protein from the meat/cereal comparison.

Competing interests



Post a comment