Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Ta |
25 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - hsi-kung Kuo |
14 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Ta |
21 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - hsi-kung Kuo |
9 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
18 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
19 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
23 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pedro Romero-Aroca |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
23 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2415-12-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.