Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Ophthalmology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort

Deborah Buck1*, Christine J Powell2, Jugnoo Rahi3, Phillippa Cumberland3, Peter Tiffin4, Robert Taylor5, John Sloper6, Helen Davis7, Emma Dawson6 and Michael P Clarke12

Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

2 Royal Victoria Infirmary Eye Dept, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, UK

3 Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK

4 Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK

5 York Hospitals NHS Trust, York, UK

6 Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

7 Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Ophthalmology 2012, 12:1  doi:10.1186/1471-2415-12-1

Published: 18 January 2012

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data.

Results

At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected.

Conclusions

Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.