Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Ophthalmology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Case report

Intraocular nematode with diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis: case report

Munira Yusoff12, Azma-Azalina Ahmad Alwi1, Mariyani Mad Said1, Sakinah Zakariah1, Zulkifli Abdul Ghani1 and Embong Zunaina2*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, 15886 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia

2 Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Ophthalmology 2011, 11:15  doi:10.1186/1471-2415-11-15


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/11/15


Received:20 February 2011
Accepted:16 June 2011
Published:16 June 2011

© 2011 Yusoff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Live intraocular nematode is a rare occurrence. Nematode can migrate actively within the eye, creating visual symptoms and damaging ocular tissue.

Case presentation

A 26-year old man presented with painless reduced vision of the left eye for one week duration. It was associated with floaters. Visual acuity on the left eye was hand movement. Anterior segment examination was normal with normal intra-ocular pressure. Fundus examination showed a live nematode lying subretinally at the macular area with macular oedema and multifocal chorioretinal lesions at peripheral retina. There was no vitritis, vasculitis or any retinal hemorrhage. Systemic examination revealed normal findings and laboratory studies only showed leucocytosis with normal eosinophil count and negative serum toxocara antibody. The diagnosis of introcular nematode with diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis was made. He was treated with oral anti-helminths and a course of oral steroid at a reducing dose. The nematode had died evidenced by its immobility during the treatment and finally disintegrated, leaving macular oedema with mottling appearance and mild hyperpigmentation. Multifocal chorioretinal lesions had also resolved. However despite treatment his visual acuity during follow-up had remained poor.

Conclusions

Cases of intraocular nematode, though not commonly encountered, continue to present the ophthalmologist with the problem of diagnosis and management and hence poorer prognosis to the patient.

Background

Live intraocular nematode is a rare occurrence and most reports were from India [1-3]. India reported few cases of Gnathostoma spinigerum [1,2]. After it gained access to the eyeball, these nematode may localize to the anterior chamber [1], the vitreous [2] or the retina [3,4]. Nematode can migrate actively within the eye, creating visual symptoms and damaging ocular tissue. Inflammation and degeneration of the posterior retina related to subretinal migration of nematode is described as diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis [5] and usually results in severe loss of vision [5,6].

Case Presentation

A 26-year old man from the outskirt of Kota Bharu in Kelantan presented with sudden onset of reduced vision of the left eye for one week duration. Initially it was a central field loss which had then progressively involved the whole visual field. It was associated with floaters but was painless with no eye redness, itchiness or discharge. He had four cats at home which he had a very close contact with. He denied any trauma to the eye or any eye injury and he had no past ocular history or medical illness.

His visual acuity was hand movement on the left eye with presence of relative afferent pupillary defect and 6/6 on the right eye. Left eye examination showed no inflammation in the anterior segment or the vitreous cavity. Funduscopic examination disclosed a white live nematode, approximately two disc diameters in length, moving slowly in the macula at the subretinal space (Figure 1). The body of the nematode was roughly tapered at one end and slightly rounded at the other end. There was presence of macular oedema and multifocal chorioretinal lesions at the peripheral retina. There was no evidence of worm track found clinically, no vasculitis or any retinal hemorrhage. However, fundus fluorescein angiography and visual evoked potential was not done in this patient. The right eye findings were normal. Systemic examination showed no significant finding with no jaundice or hepatosplenomegaly.

thumbnailFigure 1. Left fundus shows migrating nematode at macular area.

The blood investigations revealed white blood count of 10.4 × 109/L (high normal) with normal eosinophil count (0.12 × 109/L), hemoglobin of 17.0 g/L, red blood cell count of 6.38 × 1012/L (increased) and normal platelet count. The erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR), Mantoux test, liver function test, serum urea and electrolytes as well as his chest x-ray were also normal. Blood for serum toxocara antibody was negative.

Clinically he was diagnosed to have intraocular nematode with diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis. He was treated with oral albendazole 400 mg 12 hourly for five days based on recommendation by the infectious disease specialist. Two days after the treatment, the nematode was immobile, but its morphology and the rest of the retina remained the same (Figure 2). After completed five days of antihelminth, the nematode had disintegrated, leaving a mottled appearance of the macula with mild hyperpigmentation and resolving chorioretinal lesions (Figure 3). At the same time, oral prednisolone 30 mg perday for a week was also started in order to reduce the inflammation that might caused by toxins liberated from the dead nematode. Then, the dose of prednisolone was tapered down by 5 mg per week. The patient was discharged after one week with oral prednisolone of 25 mg/day. Upon discharge, his left eye visual acuity remains the same with no vitritis and resolved chorioretinal lesions.

thumbnailFigure 2. The nematode was not showing any movement anymore on day 2 of antihelminth.

thumbnailFigure 3. The nematode appeared less well-defined, with some spots of mild hyperpigmented retina surrounding it after completion 5 days of antihelminth.

Conclusions

Humans commonly acquire the infection by ingesting contaminated meat or water containing the third-stage larvae. In this patient, he might have infected the organism from his close contact with his cats at home.

This larva will continue its life cycle in human body which include the eye and incite ocular damage by a combination of mechanical, immunologic, and allergic reactions. Local inflammatory changes may be related to toxic effects or immunologic stimulation from excretory products of the larva or from release of unknown soluble tissue toxins. Inflammation and degeneration of the posterior retina related to subretinal migration of nematode is described as diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis [5]. The ocular findings include visual loss, vitreous cells, optic disc inflammation and leakage, and transient recurrent crops of gray-white outer retinal lesions. Later in the course of the disease, slowly progressive retinal pigment epithelium changes and optic atrophy may be observed, as well as narrowing of the retinal vessels [5]. In this patient, the nematode was found migrating in the subretinal space and might cause damage to the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium. Loss of vision with the presence of relative afferent pupillary defect in the affected eye might be due to death of ganglion cells and neural fibers that lead to damage to the optic nerve.

Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis has been reported initially in America [7], and later in many other countries, including China [8], Brazil [6], and India [9]. This condition occurs more frequently in males than in females and most frequently in the second and third decade [6].

Symptom relief depends on identification and removal of the nematode. However this is often difficult due to the migratory nature of the live nematode. Various types of management for intraocular nematode have been reported. Previously, the conventional treatment was surgical removal [1]. There are intravitreal or preretinal or subretinal nematode that were retrieved successfully by pars plana vitrectomy in several reported cases [2,4]. This is true for instance if the nematode is lying at the macula because other modes of treatment like photocoagulation may damage the macula. In some cases the nematode may elude capture, creating serious ocular complications. Laser photocoagulation showed successful result and can be done when the nematode moves away from the macula [3].

Antihelminthic treatment is being used more frequently [9]. High dose oral albendazole seems to be safe and beneficial for patients with active diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis in the early or late clinical stage. In this patient, he was treated with albendazole and prednisolone was added to avoid inflammatory response [6,9]. Photocoagulation or removal of nematode through vitrectomy was not done because it would jeopardize the macula and worsen his vision.

Cases of intraocular nematode, though not commonly encountered, continue to present the ophthalmologist with the problem of diagnosis and management and hence poorer prognosis to the patient.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MY examined, evaluated the patient and wrote the manuscript. AAAA, MMS, SZ and ZAG examined and evaluated the patient. ZE edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This case report was supported by Research University Grant (1001/PPSP/812064) from Universiti Sains Malaysia.

References

  1. Tiwari S, Chayani N, Rautaraya B: Intraocular Gnathostoma spinigerum: a case report.

    Cases J 2009, 2:9370. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Basak SK, Sinha TK, Bhattacharya D, Hazra TK, Parikh S: Intravitreal live gnathostoma spinigerum.

    Indian J of Ophthalmol 2004, 52:57-58. OpenURL

  3. Ittyerah TP: Nematode in the retina.

    Indian J of Ophthalmol 1990, 38(4):178-179. OpenURL

  4. Yamamoto S, Hayashi M, Takeuchi S: Surgically removed submacular nematode.

    Br J of Ophthalmol 1999, 83(9):1088. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Gass JDM, Gilbert WR, Guerry RK, Scelfo R: Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis.

    Ophthalmology 1978, 85:521-545. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  6. Garcia CA, Gomes AHB, Garcia Filho CA, Vianna RNG: Early stage diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis: improvement of vision after photocoagulation of the worm.

    Eye 2004, 18:624-627. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Cunha de Souza E, Lustosa da Cunha S, Gass JDM: Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis in South America.

    Arch Ophthalmol 1992, 110:1261-1263. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Cai J, Wei R, Zhu L, Cao M, Yu S: Diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis in China.

    Arch Ophthalmol 2000, 118:721-722. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  9. Myint K, Sahay R, Mon S, Saravanan VR, Narendran V, Dhillon B: Worm in the eye: the rationale for treatment of DUSN in south India.

    Br J Ophthalmol 2006, 90:1125-1127. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/11/15/prepub