Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Prognostic Impact of Array-based Genomic Profiles in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer

Ana Carneiro1,2 email, Anna Isinger1 email, Anna Karlsson1 email, Jan Johansson3 email, Göran Jönsson1 email, Pär-Ola Bendahl1 email, Dan Falkenback4 email, Britta Halvarsson5 email and Mef Nilbert1,6 email

1Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden

2Department of Clinical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal

3Department of Surgery, University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden

4Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, 251 87 Helsingborg, Sweden

5Department of Pathology, Helsingborg Hospital, 251 87 Helsingborg, Sweden

6Department of Clinical Sciences, Copenhagen University and Clinical Research Unit, Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark

author email corresponding author email

BMC Cancer 2008, 8:98doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-98

Published: 11 April 2008

Abstract

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a genetically complex tumor type and a major cause of cancer related mortality. Although distinct genetic alterations have been linked to ESCC development and prognosis, the genetic alterations have not gained clinical applicability. We applied array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to obtain a whole genome copy number profile relevant for identifying deranged pathways and clinically applicable markers.

Methods

A 32 k aCGH platform was used for high resolution mapping of copy number changes in 30 stage I-IV ESCC. Potential interdependent alterations and deranged pathways were identified and copy number changes were correlated to stage, differentiation and survival.

Results

Copy number alterations affected median 19% of the genome and included recurrent gains of chromosome regions 5p, 7p, 7q, 8q, 10q, 11q, 12p, 14q, 16p, 17p, 19p, 19q, and 20q and losses of 3p, 5q, 8p, 9p and 11q. High-level amplifications were observed in 30 regions and recurrently involved 7p11 (EGFR), 11q13 (MYEOV, CCND1, FGF4, FGF3, PPFIA, FAD, TMEM16A, CTTS and SHANK2) and 11q22 (PDFG). Gain of 7p22.3 predicted nodal metastases and gains of 1p36.32 and 19p13.3 independently predicted poor survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

aCGH profiling verified genetic complexity in ESCC and herein identified imbalances of multiple central tumorigenic pathways. Distinct gains correlate with clinicopathological variables and independently predict survival, suggesting clinical applicability of genomic profiling in ESCC.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated