Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cancer and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins in human cervical cancer

Magali Espinosa1, David Cantú2, Norma Herrera3, Carlos M Lopez2, Jaime G De la Garza1, Vilma Maldonado1* and Jorge Melendez-Zajgla14*

Author Affiliations

1 Subdirección de Investigación Básica. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Mexico City, Mexico

2 Departamento de Ginecologia. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Mexico City, Mexico

3 Escuela de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico

4 Research Division. Hospital Juarez de Mexico. Mexico City, Mexico

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cancer 2006, 6:45  doi:10.1186/1471-2407-6-45

Published: 27 February 2006

Abstract

Background

It has been shown that IAPs, in particular XIAP, survivin and c-IAP1, are overexpressed in several malignancies. In the present study we investigate the expression of c-IAP1, c-IAP2, XIAP and survivin and its isoforms in cervical cancer.

Methods

We used semiquantitative RT-PCR assays to analyze 41 cancer and 6 normal tissues. The study included 8 stage I cases; 16 stage II; 17 stageIII; and a control group of 6 samples of normal cervical squamous epithelial tissue.

Results

c-IAP2 and XIAP mRNA levels were similar among the samples, cervical tumors had lower c-IAP1 mRNA levels. Unexpectedly, a clear positive association was found between low levels of XIAP and disease relapse. A log-rank test showed a significant inverse association (p = 0.02) between XIAP expression and tumor aggressiveness, as indicated by disease relapse rates. There were no statistically significant differences in the presence or expression levels of c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 among any of the clinical variables studied. Survivin and its isoforms were undetectable in normal cervical tissues, in contrast with the clear upregulation observed in cancer samples. We found no association between survivin expression and age, clinical stage, histology or menopausal state. Nevertheless, we found that adenocarcinoma tumors expressed higher levels of survivin 2B and DeltaEx3 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.04 respectively, by Kruskal-Wallis). A multivariate Cox's partial likelihood-based analysis showed that only FIGO stage was an independent predictor of outcome.

Conclusion

There are no differences in the expression of c-IAP2 and XIAP between normal vs. cancer samples, but XIAP expression correlate in cervical cancer with relapse of this disease in the patients. Otherwise, c-IAP1 was downregulated in the cervical cancer samples. The expression of survivin was upregulated in the patients with cervical cancer. We have found that adenocarcinoma presented higher levels of survivin isoforms 2B and DeltaEx3.