Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cancer and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial

Donna L Berry12*, Fangxin Hong3, Barbara Halpenny2, Anne Partridge4, Erica Fox2, Jesse R Fann56, Seth Wolpin1, William B Lober1, Nigel Bush7, Upendra Parvathaneni8, Dagmar Amtmann9 and Rosemary Ford6

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Box 357366, Seattle, WA 98195-7366, USA

2 Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 518, Boston, MA 02215, USA

3 Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA

4 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA

5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

6 Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA 98109, USA

7 U.S. Department of Defense, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, National Center for Telehealth and Technology, Tacoma, Washington, USA

8 Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

9 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Box 354237, Seattle, WA 98195-4237, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cancer 2014, 14:513  doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-513

Published: 12 July 2014

Abstract

Background

The electronic self report assessment - cancer (ESRA-C), has been shown to reduce symptom distress during cancer therapy The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate aspects of how the ESRA-C intervention may have resulted in lower symptom distress (SD).

Methods

Patients at two cancer centers were randomized to ESRA-C assessment only (control) or the Web-based ESRA-C intervention delivered to patients’ homes or to a tablet in clinic. The intervention allowed patients to self-monitor symptom and quality of life (SxQOL) between visits, receive self-care education and coaching to report SxQOL to clinicians. Summaries of assessments were delivered to clinicians in both groups. Audio-recordings of clinic visits made 6 weeks after treatment initiation were coded for discussions of 26 SxQOL issues, focusing on patients’/caregivers’ coached verbal reports of SxQOL severity, pattern, alleviating/aggravating factors and requests for help. Among issues identified as problematic, two measures were defined for each patient: the percent SxQOL reported that included a coached statement, and an index of verbalized coached statements per SxQOL. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare measures between groups. Clinician responses to problematic SxQOL were compared. A mediation analysis was conducted, exploring the effect of verbal reports on SD outcomes.

Results

517 (256 intervention) clinic visits were audio-recorded. General discussion of problematic SxQOL was similar in both groups. Control group patients reported a median 75% of problematic SxQOL using any specific coached statement compared to a median 85% in the intervention group (p = .0009). The median report index of coached statements was 0.25 for the control group and 0.31 for the intervention group (p = 0.008). Fatigue, pain and physical function issues were reported significantly more often in the intervention group (all p < .05). Clinicians' verbalized responses did not differ between groups. Patients' verbal reports did not mediate final SD outcomes (p = .41).

Conclusions

Adding electronically-delivered, self-care instructions and communication coaching to ESRA-C promoted specific patient descriptions of problematic SxQOL issues compared with ESRA-C assessment alone. However, clinician verbal responses were no different and subsequent symptom distress group differences were not mediated by the patients' reports.

Trial registration

NCT00852852; 26 Feb 2009

Keywords:
Patient-provider communication; Cancer; Symptoms; Coaching; Internet