Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ren Xu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ren Xu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anke Zieseniss |
10 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmen Chak-Lui Wong |
10 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Muschler |
11 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Franziska Baenke |
12 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ren Xu |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anke Zieseniss |
25 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmen Chak-Lui Wong |
1 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Franziska Baenke |
3 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Muschler |
11 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ren Xu |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
18 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anke Zieseniss |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
26 Dec 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Jan 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.