Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cancer and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor cells detection in gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lanhua Tang12, Shushan Zhao2, Wei Liu1, Nicholas F Parchim3, Jin Huang1, Youhong Tang1, Pingping Gan1 and Meizuo Zhong1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

2 Eight-Year Program, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

3 Medical School/Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cancer 2013, 13:314  doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-314

Published: 27 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detection has previously been used for diagnosing gastric cancer. However, the previous studies failed to make an agreement whether the detection of CTCs contributes to the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the overall accuracy of CTCs detection for diagnosing gastric cancer. PubMed, Embase and the Wanfang database were searched in all languages published up to Oct 2012. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve were calculated to evaluate the overall test performance.

Results

Twenty studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The diagnostic value of CTCs detection for the gastric cancer was calculated to evaluate the overall test performance. The summary estimates of The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio were 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.67), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), 58.2 (95% CI, 9.8-345.9), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.38-0.89), and 100 (95% CI, 15–663), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95–0.98). Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test found no evidence of study publication bias in the current study (P = 0.49).

Conclusion

This systematic review suggests that CTCs detection alone cannot be recommended as a screening test for gastric cancer. However, it might be used as a noninvasive method for the confirmation of the gastric cancer diagnosis.

Keywords:
Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs); Gastric Cancer; Meta-analysis; Diagnostic Accuracy