Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Parviz Behnam-Motlagh |
| 25 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Quadros |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Krissansen |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ira Pastan |
| 20 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ira Pastan |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Parviz Behnam-Motlagh |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Quadros |
| 18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Krissansen |
| 26 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.