Table 6

Comparison of experiences and awareness of danger signs between pregnant women attending rural and urban antenatal clinics.

Characteristic
Rural pregnant women n/N (%)
Urban pregnant women n/N (%)
Relative Risk Ratio Rural/Urban (95% confidence interval)
p value

Adequate privacy
146/202 (72.3)
141/248 (56.9)
1.3 (1.1 – 1.5)
0.001
Awareness of danger signs




Anaemia/pallor/fatigue/breathlessness/dizziness
69/187 (36.9)
52/231 (22.5)
1.6 (1.2 – 2.2)
0.002
Hypertension/headache/swelling/fits
58/187 (31)
45/231 (19.5)
1.6 (1.1 – 2.2)
0.009

Antenatal client...




Said she spent 3 minutes or less with provider
136/192 (70.8)
173/246 (70.3)
1.0 (0.9–1.1)
0.84
Was told progress of pregnancy
51/202 (25.2)
64/250 (25.6)
1.0 (0.7–1.4)
0.98
Asked the antenatal care provider questions
32/202 (15.8)
26/250 (10.4)
1.5 (0.9–2.5)
0.11
Understood answers given by provider
28/33 (84.8)
27/32 (84.4)
1.0 (0.8–1.2)
0.77
Was asked to return for another visit
140/200 (70.0)
172/249 (69.1)
1.0 (0.9–1.2)
0.91
Had complications in previous pregnancy and was advised to deliver at a health facility in current pregnancy
7/25 (28.0)
6/20 (30.0)
0.9 (0.4–2.3)
0.85
Awareness of danger signs




Haemorrhage/heavy bleeding
24/187 (12.8)
38/231 (16.5)
0.8 (0.5–1.3)
0.37
Sepsis/foul smelling discharge/postpartum abdominal pain
5/187 (2.7)
16/231 (6.9)
0.4 (0.1–1.0)
0.08
Cessation of fetal movement/baby does not move
6/187 (3.2)
7/231 (3.0)
1.1 (0.4–3.1)
0.86
Light bleeding/spotting
2/187 (1.1)
7/231 (3.0)
0.4 (0.1–1.7)
0.3

Anya et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008 8:9   doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-9