Table 5 |
||||||
|
Comparison between Actual MOI for AMI in relation to Urban or Rural Residence and the Expected Minimum Level of 2% |
||||||
|
All MOI for AMI per year (N) |
Urban pop. (%) |
MOI for AMI < 10km urban (N) |
MOI for AMI < 10 km as % of all deliveries* urban |
MOI for AMI >10 km rural (N) |
MOI for AMI >10 km as % of all deliveries rural |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Lushoto |
164 |
12% |
56 |
2.4% |
108 |
0.6% |
|
Muheza |
145 |
11% |
69 |
4.9% |
76 |
0.7% |
|
Tanga Municipality |
122 |
82% |
105 |
1.1% |
17 |
0.8% |
|
Tanga Region |
431 |
30% |
230 |
1.8% |
201 |
0.7% |
|
|
||||||
|
*56 MOI for AMI were conducted for women living in urban areas of Lushoto according to study data, as a percentage of the expected EBs over one year for urban population of Lushoto (12% of 19,319) -see also table 4. |
||||||
|
Prytherch et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2007 7:16 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-7-16 |
||||||