Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neurology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment

Caroline Schnakers1, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse1, Joseph Giacino2, Manfredi Ventura3, Melanie Boly14, Steve Majerus5, Gustave Moonen4 and Steven Laureys14*

Author Affiliations

1 Coma Science Group, Cyclotron Research Center, University of Liege, Belgium

2 New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, Edison, NJ, USA

3 CTR Neurorehabilitation Centre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

4 Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman, University of Liege, Belgium

5 Department of Cognitive Sciences, Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit-URPENC, University of Liege, Belgium

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neurology 2009, 9:35  doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35

Published: 21 July 2009

Abstract

Background

Previously published studies have reported that up to 43% of patients with disorders of consciousness are erroneously assigned a diagnosis of vegetative state (VS). However, no recent studies have investigated the accuracy of this grave clinical diagnosis. In this study, we compared consensus-based diagnoses of VS and MCS to those based on a well-established standardized neurobehavioral rating scale, the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

Methods

We prospectively followed 103 patients (55 ± 19 years) with mixed etiologies and compared the clinical consensus diagnosis provided by the physician on the basis of the medical staff's daily observations to diagnoses derived from CRS-R assessments performed by research staff. All patients were assigned a diagnosis of 'VS', 'MCS' or 'uncertain diagnosis.'

Results

Of the 44 patients diagnosed with VS based on the clinical consensus of the medical team, 18 (41%) were found to be in MCS following standardized assessment with the CRS-R. In the 41 patients with a consensus diagnosis of MCS, 4 (10%) had emerged from MCS, according to the CRS-R. We also found that the majority of patients assigned an uncertain diagnosis by clinical consensus (89%) were in MCS based on CRS-R findings.

Conclusion

Despite the importance of diagnostic accuracy, the rate of misdiagnosis of VS has not substantially changed in the past 15 years. Standardized neurobehavioral assessment is a more sensitive means of establishing differential diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness when compared to diagnoses determined by clinical consensus.