Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neurology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

The quality of care delivered to Parkinson's disease patients in the U.S. Pacific Northwest Veterans Health System

Kari Swarztrauber1*, Eric Graf2 and Eric Cheng3

Author Affiliations

1 Providence Health System, Newberg, Oregon, USA

2 Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland Oregon, USA

3 Parkinson's Disease Research Education and Clinic Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neurology 2006, 6:26  doi:10.1186/1471-2377-6-26

Published: 28 July 2006

Abstract

Background

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common chronic neurological disorder of the elderly. Despite the fact that a comprehensive review of general health care in the United States showed that the quality of care delivered to patients usually falls below professional standards, there is limited data on the quality of care for patients with PD.

Methods

Using the administrative database, the Pacific Northwest Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Data Warehouse, a population of PD patients with encounters from 10/1/98-12/31/04 were identified. A random sample of 350 patient charts underwent further review for diagnostic evaluation. All patients whose records revealed a physician diagnosis of definite or possible Idiopathic Parkinson's (IPD) disease (n = 150) were included in a medical chart review to evaluate adherence to five evidence-based quality of care indicators.

Results

For those care indicators with good inter-rater reliability, 16.6% of care received by PD patients was adherent for annual depression screening, 23.4% of care was adherent for annual fall screening and, 67.3% of care was adherent for management of urinary incontinence. Patients receiving specialty care were more likely to be adherent with fall screening than those not receiving specialty care OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.2–4.2, but less likely to be adherent with management of urinary incontinence, OR = 0.3, 95%CI = 0.1–0.8. Patients receiving care outside the VA system were more likely to be adherent with depression screening OR = 2.4, 95%CI = >1.0–5.5 and fall screening OR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.1–4.4.

Conclusion

We found very low rates of adherence for annual screening for depression and falls for PD patients but reasonable adherence rates for management of urinary incontinence. Interestingly, receiving concurrent specialty care did not necessarily result in higher adherence for all care indicators suggesting some coordination and role responsibility confusion. The increased adherence in PD patients receiving care outside the VA system suggests that patients with outside care may demand better care within the VA system.