Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Natural history and prognostic factors: a retrospective review of 106 cases

Inés González-Suárez*, Irene Sanz-Gallego, Francisco Javier Rodríguez de Rivera and Javier Arpa

  • * Corresponding author: Inés González-Suárez igonsua@gmail.com

  • † Equal contributors

Author Affiliations

Section of Neuromuscular diseases, Department of Neurology, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de la Castellana, Madrid 261.28046, Spain

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neurology 2013, 13:95  doi:10.1186/1471-2377-13-95

Published: 22 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is characterized by acute onset and progressive course, and is usually associated with a good prognosis. However, there are forms of poor prognosis, needing ventilatory support and major deficits at discharge. With this study we try to identify the factors associated with a worse outcome.

Methods

106 cases of GBS admitted in our hospital between years 2000–2010 were reviewed. Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutical and evolutionary data were collected.

Results

At admission 45% had severe deficits, percentage which improves throughout the evolution of the illness, with full recovery or minor deficits in the 87% of patients at the first year review. Ages greater than 55 years, severity at admission (p < 0.001), injured cranial nerves (p = 0.008) and the needing of ventilator support (p = 0.003) were associated with greater sequels at the discharge and at the posterior reviews in the following months. 17% required mechanical ventilation (MV). Values < 250 L/min in the Peak Flow-test are associated with an increased likelihood of requiring MV (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Older age, severe deficits at onset, injured cranial nerves, requiring MV, and axonal lesion patterns in the NCS were demonstrated as poor prognostic factors. Peak Flow-test is a useful predictive factor of respiratory failure by its easy management.

Keywords:
Guillain-Barre; Natural history; Prognostic factors; Peak flow