Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neurology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

The effect of stimulation therapy and donepezil on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. A community based RCT with a two-by-two factorial design

Fred Andersen1*, Matti Viitanen2, Dag S Halvorsen3, Bjørn Straume4, Tom Wilsgaard4 and Torgeir A Engstad5

  • * Corresponding author: Fred Andersen frea@online.no

  • † Equal contributors

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, (Breivika), 9037 and Árran Lulesami Centre, (Sentrum), Drag, 8270, Tromsø, N-8270, Norway

2 Department of Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, (Huddinge), Stockholm, (141 86) Sweden, and University of Turku, (Municipality hospital), Turku, 20520, Finland

3 Department of Medicine, University hospital, (Breivika), Tromsø, 9038, Norway

4 Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, (Breivika), Tromsø, 9037, Norway

5 Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital, (Breivika), Tromsø, 9038, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neurology 2012, 12:59  doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-59

Published: 19 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Progressive neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) induces cognitive deterioration, and there is controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy in early AD. Stimulation therapy, including physical exercise and cholinesterase inhibitors are both reported to postpone cognitive deterioration in separate studies. We aimed to study the effect of stimulation therapy and the additional effect of donepezil on cognitive function in early AD.

Method

Design: A two-by-two factorial trial comprising stimulation therapy for one year compared to standard care to which a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial with donepezil was added.

Setting: Nine rural municipalities in Northern Norway.

Participants: 187 participants 65 years and older with a recent diagnosis of mild or moderate AD were included in the study of which 146 completed a one-year follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: In five municipalities the participants received stimulation therapy whereas participants in four received standard care. All participants were randomised double-blindly to donepezil or placebo and tested with three different cognitive tests four times during the one-year study period.

Main outcome: Changes in MMSE sum score.

Secondary outcome: Changes in ADAS-Cog and Clock Drawing Test.

Results

MMSE scores remained unchanged amongst AD participants receiving stimulation therapy and those receiving standard care. The results were consistent for ADAS-Cog and Clock Drawing Test. No time trend differences were found during one-year follow-up between groups receiving stimulation therapy versus standard care or between donepezil versus placebo.

Conclusion

In rural AD patients non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy did not improve outcome compared with standard care but all groups retained cognitive function during one year follow-up. Other studies are needed to confirm these results.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00443014). EudraCT database (no 2004-002613-37).

Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; Symptomatic treatment; Postponement of cognitive deterioration