Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - lea grinberg |
9 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Bak |
3 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - lea grinberg |
8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
2 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
2 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
10 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-11-50 |
You can find further information about peer review here.