Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luca De Nicola |
4 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Faissal Shaheen |
7 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Taal |
7 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Indranil Dasgupta |
7 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew S Artz |
3 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Portoles |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luca De Nicola |
17 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew S Artz |
20 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Taal |
9 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Portoles |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Portoles |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
20 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2369-14-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.