Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - steven fishbane |
17 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernard Canaud |
19 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathalie Thilly |
10 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Locatelli |
23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence McMahon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bernard Canaud |
27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Locatelli |
4 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - steven fishbane |
10 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathalie Thilly |
30 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence McMahon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence McMahon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2369-13-40 |
You can find further information about peer review here.