Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - gaetan lesca |
10 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicola Brunetti-Pierri |
27 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Siggberg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Friedman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
23 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Siggberg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicola Brunetti-Pierri |
26 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - gaetan lesca |
3 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Friedman |
14 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Siggberg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Friedman |
18 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Siggberg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-13-84 |
You can find further information about peer review here.