Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Genetics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

No association of TNFRSF1B variants with type 2 diabetes in Indians of Indo-European origin

Rubina Tabassum1, Anubha Mahajan1, Ganesh Chauhan1, Om Prakash Dwivedi1, Himanshu Dubey1, Vasudha Sharma1, Bratashree Kundu1, Saurabh Ghosh2, Nikhil Tandon3* and Dwaipayan Bharadwaj1*

Author Affiliations

1 Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi- 110 007, India

2 Human Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata- 700 108, India

3 Department of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110 029, India

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Genetics 2011, 12:110  doi:10.1186/1471-2350-12-110

Published: 17 August 2011

Abstract

Background

There has been no systematic evaluation of the association between genetic variants of type 2 receptor for TNFα (TNFR2) and type 2 diabetes, despite strong biological evidence for the role of this receptor in the pathogenesis of this complex disorder. In view of this, we performed a comprehensive association analysis of TNFRSF1B variants with type 2 diabetes in 4,200 Indo-European subjects from North India.

Methods

The initial phase evaluated association of seven SNPs viz. rs652625, rs496888, rs6697733, rs945439, rs235249, rs17883432 and rs17884213 with type 2 diabetes in 2,115 participants (1,073 type 2 diabetes patients and 1,042 control subjects). Further, we conducted replication analysis of three associated SNPs in 2,085 subjects (1,047 type 2 diabetes patients and 1,038 control subjects).

Results

We observed nominal association of rs945439, rs235249 and rs17884213 with type 2 diabetes (P < 0.05) in the initial phase. Haplotype CC of rs945439 and rs235249 conferred increased susceptibility for type 2 diabetes [OR = 1.19 (95%CI 1.03-1.37), P = 0.019/Pperm = 0.076] whereas, TG haplotype of rs235249 and rs17884213 provided protection against type 2 diabetes [OR = 0.83 (95%CI 0.72-0.95, P = 7.2 × 10-3/Pperm = 0.019]. We also observed suggestive association of rs496888 with plasma hsCRP levels [P = 0.042]. However, the association of rs945439, rs235249 and rs17884213 with type 2 diabetes was not replicated in the second study population. Meta-analysis of the two studies also failed to detect any association with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions

Our two-stage association analysis suggests that TNFRSF1B variants are not the determinants of genetic risk of type 2 diabetes in North Indians.