Table 3

Scoring of reviewed cases
Modality Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Total Non-discrepant (0–1) Concordant (0–2) Discrepant (2–4) Clinically Significant Discrepancy (3–4)
Radiography (%) 0 (0) 605 (99.0) 2 (0.3) 4 (0.7) 0 (0) 611 605 (99.0) 607 (99.3) 6 (1.0) 4 (0.7)
Fluoroscopy (%) 0 (0) 50 (98.0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.0) 51 50 (98.0) 50 (98.0) 1 (2.0) 1 (2.0)
Mammography (%) 0 (0) 385 (100.0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 385 385 (100.0) 385 (100.0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Nuclear Medicine (%) 1 (0.4) 218 (98.2) 0 (0) 3 (1.4) 0 (0) 222 219 (98.6) 219 (98.6) 3 (1.4) 3 (1.4)
Ultrasound (%) 2 (0.4) 432 (99.1) 0 (0) 2 (0.5) 0 (0) 436 434 (99.5) 434 (99.5) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5)
Total (%) 3 (0.2) 1690 (99.1) 2 (0.1) 9 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 1705 1693 (99.3) (1695 (99.4) 12 (0.7) 10 (0.6)

Numbers in brackets are percentages of each modality assigned the corresponding score. Score definitions are: 0 = positive feedback; 1 = agreement with original report. 2 = error in diagnosis- not usually made; 3 = error in diagnosis – should usually be made; 4 = error in diagnosis – should almost always be made.

O’Keeffe et al.

O’Keeffe et al. BMC Medical Imaging 2013 13:19   doi:10.1186/1471-2342-13-19

Open Data