Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
9 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Jolly |
20 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - De-Sheng Huang |
26 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Jolly |
4 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
5 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
18 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Niel Hens |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
18 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
20 Jan 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Jan 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-9-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.