Table 1

Characteristics of the population studied and urinary findings

Variable
n = 157

Age (mean ± SD), years
48 ± 12
     18 – 40
24% (37)
     40 – 60
64% (101)
     60 – 80
11% (17)
     > 80
1% (2)
Gender

     Male
45 % (71)
     Female
55 % (86)
Marital status

     Single
31% (49)
     Married
44% (69)
     Other
25% (39)
EDSS score*

     0.0
52% (80)
     1.0 – 3.0
27% (42)
     ≥ 3.0
21% (33)
Urinary Symptoms

     Present (at least one)
41% (64)
     Absent
59% (93)
Urine Culture

     Positive
10% (16)
     Negative
87% (136)
     Mixed flora or < 100.000 CFU/ml
3% (5)

* Data available for 155 patients. Of the 33 patients with EDSS ≥ 3.0, most (n = 15) were in the 3.0 – 4.0.range. The remainders were distributed as follows: EDSS 4.0 – 6.0 = 6 patients; EDSS 6.0 – 8.0 = 8 patients; EDSS of 8.0 = 4 patients.

Rocha et al. BMC Infectious Diseases 2007 7:15   doi:10.1186/1471-2334-7-15