Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Infectious Diseases and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Comparison among nasopharyngeal swab, nasal wash, and oropharyngeal swab for respiratory virus detection in adults with acute pharyngitis

Li Li1, Qiao-Yan Chen2, Yun-Ying Li2, Yan-Fang Wang3, Zi-Feng Yang1* and Nan-Shan Zhong1*

Author Affiliations

1 Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases (Guangzhou Medical University), The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 151 Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou 510120, China

2 Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of C.M., Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 111 Da De Road, Guangzhou 510120, China

3 South China Normal University, 55 Zhong Shan Road West, Guangzhou 510631, China

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Infectious Diseases 2013, 13:281  doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-281

Published: 20 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Acute pharyngitis is frequently seen in primary care. Acute viral pharyngitis may be easily misdiagnosed as acute bacterial pharyngitis. Laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of respiratory viruses is recommended. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivities among oropharyngeal swab (OPS), nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and nasal wash (NW) in adults with acute pharyngitis.

Methods

OPS, NPS, and NW were obtained from each participant with acute pharyngitis. The specimens were tested for 15 respiratory viruses by TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction. A sample was considered to be a true positive if any of the specimens was positive. The sensitivities among samples were compared by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Results

One hundred three triple samples collected consecutively by OPS, NPS, and NW were obtained. In 73 patients, one or more viruses were detected by any of the three methods. Among all viruses, the sensitivity of NPS was significantly higher than that of NW (74% vs. 49%, respectively; p < 0.01) and OPS (74% vs. 49%, respectively; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Flocked NPS collection may be the most effective alternative to NW and OPS for detection of respiratory viruses in adults with acute pharyngitis using TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Keywords:
Respiratory viruses; Acute pharyngitis; Oropharyngeal swab; Nasopharyngeal swab; Nasal wash; Sensitivity; TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction