Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dinesh Neupane |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Fielding |
16 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toby Leslie |
12 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dinesh Neupane |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Fielding |
7 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toby Leslie |
31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dinesh Neupane |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dinesh Neupane |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
30 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-12-76 |
You can find further information about peer review here.