Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Infectious Diseases and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

Pranita D Tamma1*, Nirupama Putcha2, Yong D Suh3, Kyle J Van Arendonk4 and Michael L Rinke5

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

2 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

3 Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

4 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA

5 Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Infectious Diseases 2011, 11:181  doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-181

Published: 22 June 2011

Abstract

Background

The emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives (MDRGNs) coupled with an alarming scarcity of new antibiotics has forced the optimization of the therapeutic potential of available antibiotics. To exploit the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration mechanism of β-lactams, prolonging their infusion may improve outcomes. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine if prolonged β-lactam infusion resulted in decreased mortality and improved clinical cure compared to intermittent β-lactam infusion.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Heterogeneity was assessed qualitatively, in addition to I2 and Chi-square statistics. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models.

Results

Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Prolonged infusion β-lactams were not associated with decreased mortality (n= 982; RR 0.92; 95% CI:0.61-1.37) or clinical cure (n = 1380; RR 1.00 95% CI:0.94-1.06) compared to intermittent infusions. Subgroup analysis for β-lactam subclasses and equivalent total daily β-lactam doses yielded similar results. Most studies had notable methodological flaws.

Conclusions

No clinical advantage was observed for prolonged infusion β-lactams. The limited number of studies with MDRGNs precluded evaluation of prolonged infusion of β-lactams for this subgroup. A large, multicenter RCT with critically ill patients infected with MDRGNs is needed.

Keywords:
β-lactams; infusion; multi-drug resistant Gram-negatives; antibiotics