Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment

Tzvi Dwolatzky1 email, Victor Whitehead2 email, Glen M Doniger3 email, Ely S Simon3 email, Avraham Schweiger4 email, Dena Jaffe5 email and Howard Chertkow2 email

1Memory Disorders Clinic and Dept. of Geriatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

2Department of Clinical Neurosciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

3Department of Clinical Science, NeuroTrax Corporation, New York, NY USA

4Department of Behavioral Sciences, Academic College of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel

5School of Public Health, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel

author email corresponding author email

BMC Geriatrics 2003, 3:4doi:10.1186/1471-2318-3-4

Published: 2 November 2003

Abstract

Background

The NeuroTrax Mindstreams computerized cognitive assessment system was designed for widespread clinical and research use in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the capability of Mindstreams tests to discriminate elderly with MCI from those who are cognitively healthy has yet to be evaluated. Moreover, the comparability between these tests and traditional neuropsychological tests in detecting MCI has not been examined.

Methods

A 2-center study was designed to assess discriminant validity of tests in the Mindstreams Mild Impairment Battery. Participants were 30 individuals diagnosed with MCI, 29 with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 39 healthy elderly. Testing was with the Mindstreams battery and traditional neuropsychological tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the ability of Mindstreams and traditional measures to discriminate those with MCI from cognitively healthy elderly. Between-group comparisons were made (Mann-Whitney U test) between MCI and healthy elderly and between MCI and mild AD groups.

Results

Mindstreams outcome parameters across multiple cognitive domains significantly discriminated among MCI and healthy elderly with considerable effect sizes (p < 0.05). Measures of memory, executive function, visual spatial skills, and verbal fluency discriminated best, and discriminability was at least comparable to that of traditional neuropsychological tests in these domains.

Conclusions

Mindstreams tests are effective in detecting MCI, providing a comprehensive profile of cognitive function. Further, the enhanced precision and ease of use of these computerized tests make the NeuroTrax system a valuable clinical tool in the identification of elderly at high risk for dementia.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated