BMC Geriatrics Volume 3
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 Research articleValidity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairmentTzvi Dwolatzky1 , Victor Whitehead2 , Glen M Doniger3 , Ely S Simon3 , Avraham Schweiger4 , Dena Jaffe5 and Howard Chertkow2  1Memory Disorders Clinic and Dept. of Geriatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel 2Department of Clinical Neurosciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 3Department of Clinical Science, NeuroTrax Corporation, New York, NY USA 4Department of Behavioral Sciences, Academic College of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel 5School of Public Health, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel author email corresponding author email
BMC Geriatrics 2003,
3:4doi:10.1186/1471-2318-3-4
|
|
| Published: |
2 November 2003 |
Abstract
Background
The NeuroTrax Mindstreams computerized cognitive assessment system was designed for widespread clinical and research use in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the capability of Mindstreams tests to discriminate elderly with MCI from those who are cognitively healthy has yet to be evaluated. Moreover, the comparability between these tests and traditional neuropsychological tests in detecting MCI has not been examined.
Methods
A 2-center study was designed to assess discriminant validity of tests in the Mindstreams Mild Impairment Battery. Participants were 30 individuals diagnosed with MCI, 29 with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 39 healthy elderly. Testing was with the Mindstreams battery and traditional neuropsychological tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the ability of Mindstreams and traditional measures to discriminate those with MCI from cognitively healthy elderly. Between-group comparisons were made (Mann-Whitney U test) between MCI and healthy elderly and between MCI and mild AD groups.
Results
Mindstreams outcome parameters across multiple cognitive domains significantly discriminated among MCI and healthy elderly with considerable effect sizes (p < 0.05). Measures of memory, executive function, visual spatial skills, and verbal fluency discriminated best, and discriminability was at least comparable to that of traditional neuropsychological tests in these domains.
Conclusions
Mindstreams tests are effective in detecting MCI, providing a comprehensive profile of cognitive function. Further, the enhanced precision and ease of use of these computerized tests make the NeuroTrax system a valuable clinical tool in the identification of elderly at high risk for dementia. |