Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mudge |
23 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Drawz |
18 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mudge |
2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Drawz |
11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-43 |
You can find further information about peer review here.