Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrich Leuschner |
20 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Forton |
14 Nov 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter ter Borg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Nov 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Forton |
22 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrich Leuschner |
23 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter ter Borg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter ter Borg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter ter Borg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrich Leuschner |
23 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Forton |
13 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter ter Borg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
24 Mar 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Mar 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-5-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.