Peer Review reports
From: Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Beatrice Pilz |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Church |
| 28 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Van Gossum |
| 9 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Beatrice Pilz |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Van Gossum |
| 9 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Herfarth |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 16 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Beatrice Pilz |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 16 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Beatrice Pilz |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 16 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-10-66 |
You can find further information about peer review here.