|
Performance against 'close to practice' indicators. |
|||||||
| Indicator |
Teams |
Comments |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
||
|
|
|||||||
| Research question developed from practice |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Five teams were able to do project work that related to practice. Team six were unable to develop an idea together. |
|
| Research question developed with patients and the public |
✓ |
* |
* |
* Teams four and five worked with patients and the public but not on research questions. Team two developed research priorities with patients and the public. |
|||
| Examples of research projects, and findings, have had an impact on local practice |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Team five linked projects in with clinical audit. |
|
Cooke et al. BMC Family Practice 2008 9:37 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-37 |
|||||||