Research article

Methodological standards in non-inferiority AIDS trials: moving from adherence to compliance

Jean-Jacques Parienti^1,2 , Renaud Verdon³ and Véronique Massari¹

¹Inserm UMR-S 707, Paris, F-75012; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, UMR-S 707, Paris, F-75012, France

²Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Côte de Nacre University hospital, 14033 Caen, France

³Department of Infectious Diseases, Côte de Nacre University hospital, 14033 Caen, France

author email corresponding author email

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:46doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-46

Published:	20 September 2006

Abstract

Background

The interpretation of the results of active-control trials regarding the efficacy and safety of a new drug is important for drug registration and following clinical use. It has been suggested that non-inferiority and equivalence studies are not reported with the same quantitative rigor as superiority studies.

Methods

Standard methodological criteria for non-inferiority and equivalence trials including design, analysis and interpretation issues were applied to 18 recently conducted large non-inferiority (15) and equivalence (3) randomized trials in the field of AIDS antiretroviral therapy. We used the continuity-corrected non-inferiority chi-square to test 95% confidence interval treatment difference against the predefined non-inferiority margin.

Results

The pre-specified non-inferiority margin ranged from 10% to 15%. Only 4 studies provided justification for their choice. 39% of the studies (7/18) reported only intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis for the primary endpoint. When on-treatment (OT) and ITT statistical analyses were provided, ITT was favoured over OT for results interpretation for all but one study, inappropriately in this statistical context. All but two of the studies concluded there was "similar" efficacy of the experimental group. However, 9/18 had inconclusive results for non-inferiority.

Conclusion

Conclusions about non-inferiority should be drawn on the basis of the confidence interval analysis of an appropriate primary endpoint, using the predefined criteria for non-inferiority, in both OT and ITT, in compliance with the non-inferiority and equivalence CONSORT statement. We suggest that the use of the non-inferiority chi-square test may provide additional useful information.