Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details

Comments(1)

Scratch lottery tickets are a poor incentive to respond to mailed questionnaires

Vilhjalmur Finsen email and Andreas H Storeheier email

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6:19doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-19

Possible bias in study design

David J Torgerson   (02 May 2006)  University of York email

Whilst the study is described as a randomized controlled trial, unfortunately it does not appear to be one. The randomization procedure appears to be flawed. The authors created a list of participants based on their first names with those with first names beginning A at the top of the list and those with Z at the bottom. They then took the first 250 and allocated them to an intervention and so on. This is not randomization: it is quasi-alternation and can lead to bias. Your study may be biased as we can observe far fewer women in the control group than in the other groups. Presumably this is because Norwegian female names favour letters closer to A than Z. Also there will be a bias towards non-Norwegian names or certain religious group, which favour certain letters in the alphabet and will be represented in greater numbers in some of the groups. Unfortunately, due to these biases the study results may not be reliable.

Competing interests

None

top

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.