|
Results of our meta-analysis with the real sample data as one subgroup, and our estimates of the sample as the second subgroup. |
||||
| Actual Sample |
Our Estimate |
|||
|
|
||||
| WMD [95% CI] |
% Weight |
WMD [95% CI] |
% Weight |
|
|
|
||||
| Pooled WMD |
-0.37 [-37.17, 36.44] |
42.00 |
0.41 [-30.92, 31.73] |
58.00 |
| Overall pooled WMD |
0.08 |
100.00 |
||
| Heterogeneity statistic |
degrees of freedom |
P |
I-squared |
|
| Sample |
0.04 |
9 |
1.000 |
0.0% |
| Estimate |
0.04 |
9 |
1.000 |
0.0% |
| Overall |
0.08 |
19 |
1.000 |
0.0% |
| Overall Test for heterogeneity between sub-groups |
||||
| 0.00 |
1 |
0.975 |
||
| Significance test(s) of WMD = 0 |
Sample |
z = 0.02 |
p = 0.984 |
|
| Estimate |
z = 0.03 |
p = 0.980 |
||
| Overall |
z = 0.01 |
p = 0.995 |
||
|
1I-squared: the variation in WMD attributable to heterogeneity | ||||
Hozo et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2005 5:13 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 |
||||