Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening
-
* Corresponding author: Stuart G Baker sb16i@nih.gov
1 Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A
2 Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2002, 2:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-2-11
Published: 19 September 2002Abstract
Background
The evaluation of randomized trials for cancer screening involves special statistical considerations not found in therapeutic trials. Although some of these issues have been discussed previously, we present important recent and new methodologies.
Methods
Our emphasis is on simple approaches.
Results
We make the following recommendations:
(1) Use death from cancer as the primary endpoint, but review death records carefully and report all causes of death
(2) Use a simple "causal" estimate to adjust for nonattendance and contamination occurring immediately after randomization
(3) Use a simple adaptive estimate to adjust for dilution in follow-up after the last screen
Conclusion
The proposed guidelines combine recent methodological work on screening endpoints and noncompliance/contamination with a new adaptive method to adjust for dilution in a study where follow-up continues after the last screen. These guidelines ensure good practice in the design and analysis of randomized trials of cancer screening.