Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening

Stuart G Baker¹ , Barnett S Kramer² and Philip C Prorok¹

¹Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A

²Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A

author email corresponding author email

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2002, 2:11doi:10.1186/1471-2288-2-11


Published:	19 September 2002

Abstract

Background

The evaluation of randomized trials for cancer screening involves special statistical considerations not found in therapeutic trials. Although some of these issues have been discussed previously, we present important recent and new methodologies.

Methods

Our emphasis is on simple approaches.

Results

We make the following recommendations:

(1) Use death from cancer as the primary endpoint, but review death records carefully and report all causes of death

(2) Use a simple "causal" estimate to adjust for nonattendance and contamination occurring immediately after randomization

(3) Use a simple adaptive estimate to adjust for dilution in follow-up after the last screen

Conclusion

The proposed guidelines combine recent methodological work on screening endpoints and noncompliance/contamination with a new adaptive method to adjust for dilution in a study where follow-up continues after the last screen. These guidelines ensure good practice in the design and analysis of randomized trials of cancer screening.