Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Research Methodology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery

Alexander Engelhardt1, Rajesh Kanawade4, Christian Knipfer2, Matthias Schmid3, Florian Stelzle2 and Werner Adler1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erlangen University Hospital, Glückstrasse 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

3 Department of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany

4 SAOT - Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies, Paul-Gordan-Strasse 6, 91052 Erlangen, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014, 14:91  doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-91

Published: 16 July 2014

Abstract

Background

In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.

Methods

In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms’ performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.

Results

Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.

Conclusion

The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.

The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.

Keywords:
Laser surgery; Reflectance spectroscopy; Machine learning; Penalized discriminant analysis