Table 2 |
||||||
| Fitting statistics of 7 competing models that are only different in the number of latent classes | ||||||
| # latent classes (G) | OHTS | EGPS | ||||
| BIC | LMR-LRT* | Minimal class size | BIC | LMR-LRT | Minimal class size | |
| 2 | 97097 | <0.001 | 47% | 39235 | <0.001 | 44% |
| 3 | 94219 | 0.002 | 24% | 38395 | 0.001 | 14% |
| 4 | 92922 | 0.609 | 14% | 38109 | 0.005 | 11% |
| 5 | 92107 | 0.003 | 13% | 37870 | 0.009 | 12% |
| 6 | 91644 | 0.042 | 10% | 37760 | 0.452 | 9% |
| 7 | 91289 | 0.147 | 7% | 37682 | 0.060 | 5% |
| 8 | 91045 | 0.406 | 6% | 37608 | 0.011 | 4% |
* Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, with a smaller p-value favoring the G-class model over the model with G-1 classes (null hypothesis).
Gao et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012 12:151 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-151
