Table 2

Comparison between review results for nicotine patch in 1994 and 2000

Review year

1994

2000


a) All trials

No. of trials

9

30

Odds ratio

2.07

1.73

95% CI

1.64–2.62

1.56–1.93

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

7.08 (p = 0.53)

41.75(p = 075)

b) Level of support sub group:

No. of trials

4

12

-Low intensity

Odds ratio

2.52

1.74

95% CI

1.64–3.87

1.48–2.04

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

4.84(p = 0.18)

18.69(p = 0.096)

-High intensity

No. of trials

5

18

Odds ratio

1.99

1.73

95% CI

1.49–2.64

1.51–1.99

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

2.55 (p = 0.64)

23.06 (p = 0.15)

c) Length of follow-up subgroups:

No. of trials

3

11

-6 months

Odds ratio

1.96

1.96

95% CI

1.44–2.66

1.65–2.34

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

1.74(p = 0.72)

8.06 (p = 0.62)

-12 months

No. of trials

6

19

Odds ratio

2.09

1.62

95% CI

1.39–3.12

1.42–1.84

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

2.38 (p = 0.67)

30.67 (p = 0.044)


Stead et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001 1:10   doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-10

Open Data