Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Emergency Medicine and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia: a case control study

Roszalina Ramli12*, Jennifer Oxley3, Peter Hillard3, Ahmad Farhan Mohd Sadullah4 and Roderick McClure3

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, 56000 Jalan Yaacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2 Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC), Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 46150 Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

3 Monash Injury Research Institute (MIRI), Building 70, Monash University, 3800 Monash, VIC, Australia

4 School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal Penang, Malaysia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Emergency Medicine 2014, 14:17  doi:10.1186/1471-227X-14-17

Published: 3 August 2014

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of helmets in reducing the risk of severe head injury in motorcyclists who were involved in a crash is well established. There is limited evidence however, regarding the extent to which helmets protect riders from facial injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of helmet type, components and fixation status on the risk of facial injuries among Malaysian motorcyclists.

Method

755 injured motorcyclists were recruited over a 12-month period in 2010–2011 in southern Klang Valley, Malaysia in this case control study. Of the 755 injured motorcyclists, 391participants (51.8%) sustained facial injuries (cases) while 364 (48.2%) participants were without facial injury (control). The outcomes of interest were facial injury and location of facial injury (i.e. upper, middle and lower face injuries). A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between helmet characteristics and the outcomes, taking into account potential confounders such as age, riding position, alcohol and illicit substance use, type of colliding vehicle and type of collision. Helmet fixation was defined as the position of the helmet during the crash whether it was still secured on the head or had been dislodged.

Results

Helmet fixation was shown to have a greater effect on facial injury outcome than helmet type. Increased odds of adverse outcome was observed for the non-fixed helmet compared to the fixed helmet with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10 (95% CI 1.41- 3.13) for facial injury; AOR = 6.64 (95% CI 3.71-11.91) for upper face injury; AOR = 5.36 (95% CI 3.05-9.44) for middle face injury; and AOR = 2.00 (95% CI 1.22-3.26) for lower face injury. Motorcyclists with visor damage were shown with AOR = 5.48 (95% CI 1.46-20.57) to have facial injuries compared to those with an undamaged visor.

Conclusions

A helmet of any type that is properly worn and remains fixed on the head throughout a crash will provide some form of protection against facial injury. Visor damage is a significant contributing factor for facial injury. These findings are discussed with reference to implications for policy and initiatives addressing helmet use and wearing behaviors.

Keywords:
Helmet type; Helmet component; Helmet fixation; Facial injury; Klang Valley; Malaysia