Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Aug 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
5 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephane Arques |
10 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
18 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephane Arques |
9 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
17 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
17 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
21 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ken Shimamoto |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
21 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jan 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Jan 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-9-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.