BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articleIs population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?Lars Ehlers1 , Jan Sørensen2 , Lotte Groth Jensen3 , Merete Bech3 and Mette Kjølby3  1
Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark 2
Centre for Applied Health Services Research and Technology Assessment, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark 3
Centre for Public Health, Denmark author email corresponding author email
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2008,
8:32doi:10.1186/1471-2261-8-32
|
|
| Published: |
18 November 2008 |
Abstract
Background
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1–2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA.
Methods
We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care.
Results
The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions.
Conclusion
Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended. |