Table 2 |
||||
|
Lipid testing, pharmacologic treatment, and goal attainment among African-American men and women and Caucasian women relative to Caucasian men from logistic regression analyses.* |
||||
|
African American |
Caucasian |
|||
|
Women Odds Ratio (95% CI)* |
Men Odds Ratio (95% CI)* |
Women Odds Ratio (95% CI)* |
Men Reference Group |
|
|
|
||||
|
LDL-C tested (n = 23,104) |
0.49 (0.37,0.64) |
0.60 (0.47,0.77) |
0.80 (0.74,0.86) |
1.00 |
|
Lipid drug prescribed (n = 14,499)† |
0.62 (0.46,0.83) |
0.59 (0.45,0.78) |
1.04 (0.95,1.13) |
1.00 |
|
LDL-C goal attainment (n = 8,336) ‡ |
0.55 (0.36,0.82) |
0.47 (0.30,0.74) |
0.76 (0.68,0.85) |
1.00 |
|
|
||||
|
*Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from logistic regression models accounting for within-practice correlations with GEE and controlling for race, sex, age, medical history (diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypertension), and geographic region of medical practice. †Regression model includes serum LDL-C concentration. ‡LDL-C goal attainment (<100 mg/dL) among those with documented LDL-C values and treated with lipid-lowering drugs. |
||||
|
Massing et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2004 4:15 doi:10.1186/1471-2261-4-15 |
||||